Dear Parents and Guidance Counselors,

Application season is officially open. Common App, Apply Texas, Scoir/Coalition, and the UC system all unlocked their portals on August 1, and by the time this reaches your inbox, most rising seniors have already started building their college lists. What makes this cycle different is the gap between what families expect and what the data actually shows. We keep hearing about the "enrollment cliff" — a real and structural decline in the number of college-age students — and the assumption is that fewer applicants means an easier path in. It doesn't. The most selective schools are more oversubscribed than ever, even as the overall applicant pool begins to shrink.

This edition covers five developments that will shape how your family should approach the next four months: a major shift in early admissions strategy out of Ann Arbor, a financial aid system in transition ahead of the October 1 FAFSA launch, a new round of federal pressure on universities, and a growing set of lower-cost pathways into flagship brand names. As always, I've tried to translate the headlines into what you should actually do this week.

— Dr. Nathan Hurwitz

College Admissions Consultant · Hurwitz Consulting · (203) 613-9262

Common App, Apply Texas, Scoir/Coalition, and the UC application all opened on August 1, officially launching the 2026-27 cycle. For families, it's the starting gun. For the sector, it's the first cycle to arrive alongside a demographic shift admissions offices have been bracing for since Nathan Grawe's 2018 research first popularized the term "enrollment cliff."

According to the Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education, U.S. high school graduates peaked at roughly 3.9 million in 2025 and are now in a steady, structural decline projected to reach 13% by 2041 — about 576,000 fewer graduates than today's pipeline produces. The decline is uneven: the Northeast and Midwest face the steepest drops, while the South and West are cushioned by migration-driven population growth.

Here's the catch for families hoping the cliff means easier admission: it doesn't, at least not at the top. Fewer 18-year-olds nationally has not translated into fewer applications at brand-name schools, because more students than ever are applying to more schools than ever. The result is what one industry analysis calls the end of the "safety flagship" — UCLA's overall admit rate has settled around 9%, lower than several Ivy League campuses, and out-of-state admit rates there sit in the low single digits.

For the Fall 2026 entering class, the University of Michigan is offering a binding Early Decision plan for the first time in its history, alongside its longstanding Early Action and Regular Decision rounds. It's a significant shift for a flagship that, for most of the past five years, ran only EA and RD — and it puts Michigan in the same strategic category as Purdue, UNC, and other public flagships that have adopted binding early rounds to manage enrollment and yield.

The numbers explain the motivation. Michigan's application volume has climbed from under 80,000 five years ago to more than 109,000 for the current cycle, while its admit rate has fallen from roughly 20% to about 16%. ED applicants apply by November 1 — the same date as Early Action — but commit to enroll if admitted and must withdraw all other applications. Decisions are released by December 24, with a commitment deadline of January 6. Michigan remains need-blind and continues to meet full demonstrated need for in-state students; ED applicants who submit the CSS Profile and FAFSA by November 15 receive a financial aid package alongside their admission decision.

Notably, Michigan's School of Music, Theatre & Dance is not participating in the ED round. Industry analysts believe Michigan may admit roughly half of its incoming class from the combined ED/EA pool, though the university has not confirmed a target split.

The 2026-27 FAFSA — the form families will use for fall 2026 and spring 2027 aid — opens October 1, and the One Big Beautiful Bill Act has reshaped several of its mechanics. Families who filled out last year's form should not assume this year's process works the same way.

Starting this August, users who create a StudentAid.gov account with a valid Social Security number are verified immediately rather than waiting one to three days — a meaningful fix for families who historically scrambled near deadlines. On the borrowing side, Parent PLUS loans are now capped at $20,000 per year and $65,000 over a student's undergraduate career, a significant constraint for families who previously used PLUS loans to close large gaps between aid and cost of attendance. The Student Aid Index calculation has also been narrowed: the net worth of family-owned small businesses (100 or fewer employees), family farms, and family-owned commercial fishing operations is now excluded from the assets families must report — a change that could meaningfully help small-business and farm families qualify for need-based aid. On the Pell Grant side, the OBBBA now folds the foreign earned income exclusion into the adjusted gross income used to determine eligibility, which could reduce awards for some families with overseas income.

In October 2025, the Trump administration offered nine universities — including Brown, MIT, Penn, and UT Austin — priority access to federal funding in exchange for signing the "Compact for Academic Excellence in Higher Education," a package of demands touching admissions criteria, hiring, and campus speech. All nine declined. Earlier this month, Education Secretary Linda McMahon revived the effort in a new form.

In an open letter, McMahon asked every college and university president and governing board to publish a "statement of principles" on their institution's website before the end of 2026, addressing seven areas: admissions criteria, free speech protections, faculty hiring processes, tuition costs, artificial intelligence, foreign influence, and institutional transparency. Unlike the original compact, the letter does not dangle easier access to federal funding, and it drops some of the most contested provisions from Compact 1.0, such as a hard cap on international enrollment. Separately, the Heritage Foundation released model state legislation on August 6 that would let state lawmakers codify similar requirements at public universities by statute, rather than waiting for individual schools to opt in voluntarily.

So far, only New College of Florida and Valley Forge Military College have expressed support for the original compact framework; Grand Canyon University has indicated interest while awaiting a final version. Higher education labor groups have criticized the new letter as a rebranded version of the same agenda.

As flagship universities face record application volume and capacity constraints, more of them are formalizing "two-step" admission pathways rather than simply shrinking their admit rates further. The University of Texas at Austin is a good example: under a partnership with Austin Community College, students start their first semester at ACC rather than UT, paying ACC's substantially lower tuition. Students who complete 15 credits with at least a 3.2 GPA are guaranteed a spot at UT Austin for the following spring semester.

UT Austin has also launched the Transfer Admission Pathway (TAP), a new pilot with St. Edward's University, a smaller private campus in Austin. First-year applicants who want a UT Austin degree but don't gain direct first-year admission can begin at St. Edward's and transfer in under a defined pathway agreement — starting with the Fall 2026 cohort.

These programs aren't unique to Texas — most large public systems now have some version of a guaranteed transfer pathway from a community college or partner campus. For families anxious about landing a first-choice flagship outright, they're an increasingly legitimate — and increasingly formalized — plan B.

On the FAFSA: Start flagging the Parent PLUS cap and the new SAI asset exclusions with families now, well before October 1. Small-business and farm families in particular may be pleasantly surprised — but only if they know to ask.

On Michigan's Early Decision: Expect a wave of questions from students who assumed Michigan was a safe EA option. Help them separate genuine first-choice enthusiasm from the pressure of a new binding deadline, especially for out-of-state families facing a $90,000+ cost of attendance.

On the Compact 2.0 letter: Families will ask you what it means. The honest answer is that it's unresolved policy, not a change to how any specific admissions office reviews applications today — worth saying plainly to keep anxiety in check.

Forward freely with attribution — if this was useful for your caseload, I'm always glad to talk through specific student situations.

A College Readiness Assessment gives you a clear, honest read on where your student stands today — and a concrete plan for the months ahead.

Not ready for a full assessment?  Start with the free Parent Starter Kit →