Higher Ed Insider — Edition 2026-24
A $70,000 OPT fee proposal, a federal J-1 probe, DOJ’s UCLA Law finding, the earliest FAFSA ever, and how to vet a college’s finances.
A HURWITZ CONSULTING PUBLICATION |
|
Higher Ed Insider
HIGHER EDUCATION INTELLIGENCE FOR FAMILIES & COUNSELORS
|
|
|
| |
| EDITION 2026-24 · SEPTEMBER 26 – OCTOBER 9, 2026 |
© 2026 Hurwitz Consulting |
|
hurwitzadmissions.com · nathan@hurwitzadmissions.com · (203) 613-9262 |
|
WATCH. READ. FOLLOW.
YouTube: @HurwitzAdmissions | Blog: hurwitzadmissions.com/blog | Facebook: Hurwitz Admissions | Instagram: @hurwitzadmissions
|
|
BY THE NUMBERS
|
$70,000
Proposed OPT fee for a student’s first recommendation, paid by the school
|
15.6%
Drop in Indiana University’s international enrollment, fall 2026
|
|
9
Universities named in the J-1 visa investigation
|
Sept. 23
2027–28 FAFSA opens — the earliest launch ever
|
|
1,396
Colleges still missing outcomes-data files (ED, Oct. 8)
|
Jan. 15
Outcomes-data deadline; ED says no extension
|
|
|
EDITOR’S NOTE
Dear Parents and Guidance Counselors,
The past two weeks brought a proposed $70,000 fee on international students’ post-graduation work authorization, new federal scrutiny of nine research universities, a Justice Department finding about admissions at UCLA’s law school, and the earliest FAFSA launch in history. Different agencies, different targets — but one shared effect: more uncertainty for families trying to plan.
My job in this edition is to separate signal from noise. Several of these items are proposals, allegations, or findings that have not yet been tested in court, and I have labeled them that way. Where the facts are contested, I have tried to give you the strongest case on each side before offering my own read.
With Early Action and Early Decision deadlines about three weeks away, the most practical guidance is in the Action Guide at the end. If you read nothing else, read that. Then reply and tell me what you would like covered next.
— Dr. Nathan Hurwitz
College Admissions Consultant · Hurwitz Consulting · (203) 613-9262
|
|
THIS EDITION’S COVERAGE
| 01 |
A $70,000 Price Tag on Post-Graduation Work INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS · FEDERAL POLICY
|
| 02 |
Washington Widens Its Lens on Elite Campuses ELITE CAMPUSES · FEDERAL ENFORCEMENT
|
| 03 |
DOJ Says UCLA Law Used Race in Admissions ADMISSIONS · JUSTICE DEPARTMENT · THE ESSAY
|
| 04 |
FAFSA Opens at Record Speed — Outcomes Data Lags FINANCIAL AID · DATA
|
| 05 |
Is Your College Choice Financially Sound? COLLEGE FINANCES · DUE DILIGENCE
|
|
| TOPIC 01 |
INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS · FEDERAL POLICY |
A $70,000 Price Tag on Post-Graduation Work: DHS Targets OPT
A proposed rule would make schools pay to recommend students for Optional Practical Training, while a separate visa-duration rule sits in court limbo.
The Department of Homeland Security has proposed a rule that would require a school to pay $70,000 the first time it recommends a student for Optional Practical Training (OPT), the program that lets international students work in jobs related to their field of study. Each later recommendation, including STEM OPT extensions, would cost $30,000, according to an immigration-law analysis of the proposal. Schools, not students, would pay up front, though the same analysis notes they could try to recover the cost from students, employers, or other funding sources.
DHS says the fees would deter fraud, strengthen oversight, and reduce reliance on OPT as a long-term employment pathway; the Associated Press reports the department described the program as a “pipeline for cheap foreign labor.” By DHS’s own estimate, about 194,000 students were on OPT and 95,000 on STEM OPT in 2024, and the fees could total $8.4 billion to $16.5 billion a year. The department also acknowledges some schools might stop funding OPT altogether. NAFSA, the international-education association, warned that driving students away would harm American innovation and economic growth.
The proposal is not final. Reports differ on the length of the public comment window, so check the Federal Register notice for the exact deadline. If a final rule follows, the fee would apply to recommendations made 60 days after publication, and the rule could face legal challenges. Separately, the DHS rule that would have replaced “duration of status” with a fixed stay of up to four years was blocked nationwide by a federal judge in Massachusetts in mid-September. DHS has appealed to the 1st Circuit; until that is resolved, duration of status remains in effect.
|
THE OPT FEE PROPOSAL AT A GLANCE
| First OPT recommendation |
$70,000 (paid by the school) |
| Later OPT, incl. STEM OPT extensions |
$30,000 each |
| Participants in 2024 (DHS estimate) |
~194,000 OPT · ~95,000 STEM OPT |
| Estimated annual fee total (DHS) |
$8.4 – $16.5 billion |
| Effective date |
60 days after a final rule |
| Status |
Proposed — not final |
|
|
DR. HURWITZ’S TAKE
I want to be fair here: fraud in any work-authorization program deserves enforcement, and reasonable people disagree about how much OPT should function as a bridge into the American workforce. But a flat fee of this size lands on schools, and the institutions most likely to respond by dropping OPT support are smaller, tuition-dependent ones. If your family is international, ask every school on your list — in writing — whether it intends to fund OPT if this rule is finalized. If you are a domestic family, remember that shifts in international enrollment change what some colleges can afford to offer you.
|
|
THE CASE FOR THE PROPOSAL
- Targets fraud and abuse concerns DHS says it has documented in the program
- Could discourage programs built mainly around work authorization rather than education
- Supporters argue it protects entry-level jobs for American graduates
- DHS says the fees would help offset the cost of administering a very large program
|
|
|
|
THE CASE AGAINST
- DHS itself acknowledges some schools may stop funding OPT, sharply reducing participation
- NAFSA and employers warn of harm to innovation, research, and hiring
- Could make U.S. study less attractive and cut tuition revenue at small colleges
- Likely legal challenges mean prolonged uncertainty for students already enrolled
|
|
|
✓ ACTION CHECKLIST
| ✓ |
International families: ask each school in writing whether it will fund OPT and STEM OPT if the rule is finalized. |
| ✓ |
Check your I-94 at i94.cbp.dhs.gov — “D/S” means no action is needed; a specific end date means contact your international office. |
| ✓ |
Read the Federal Register notice for the exact comment deadline and submit a comment if you wish. |
| ✓ |
Avoid irreversible decisions based on speculation about the appeal or the final rule. |
|
|
| ✦ ✦ ✦ |
| TOPIC 02 |
ELITE CAMPUSES · FEDERAL ENFORCEMENT |
Washington Widens Its Lens on Elite Campuses: J-1 Probes and a Harvard Subpoena
Nine universities face Labor Department subpoenas over research visas, the EEOC asks a court to enforce a subpoena against Harvard, and courts continue to referee.
Vice President JD Vance, who chairs the administration’s fraud task force, announced that nine universities are under investigation for allegedly misusing the J-1 exchange-visitor program to bring in foreign workers who undercut American wages. The Labor Department’s inspector general, Anthony D’Esposito, is leading the probe and says it will examine whether visa abuse, foreign influence, or improper financial relationships are compromising federally funded research. Subpoenas have been served. Brown said its subpoena seeks records on federal foreign-labor programs, and MIT described its own as “very broad.”
Vance cited J-1 use on federally funded grants at about 61 percent at the named schools versus 38 percent nationally, and claimed American graduate students earn roughly $20,000 more than J-1 holders. Those are officials’ claims; no findings of wrongdoing have been made. Stanford, Brown, Arizona State, and MIT each say they follow visa law, and several note that the government vets every J-1 participant.
On a parallel track, the EEOC asked a federal court on Sept. 29 to enforce a subpoena against Harvard in an investigation of whether its faculty-diversity goals amount to race and sex discrimination in hiring, a charge filed by EEOC Chair Andrea Lucas in April 2025. Harvard says the subpoena contains more than 700 requests, that it has already produced more than 9,000 pages, and that the demand is a “fishing expedition” and retaliatory. Courts, meanwhile, are not rubber stamps: a judge dismissed the Justice Department’s challenge to Virginia’s in-state tuition laws for undocumented students in a ruling reported Oct. 8, the second such dismissal, though DOJ has prevailed in six other states.
|
ELITE SPOTLIGHT: THE NINE UNIVERSITIES NAMED IN THE J-1 PROBE
| Arizona State University |
Brown University |
Harvard University |
| Yale University |
Stanford University |
California Institute of Technology |
| Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
UC Davis |
University of Pittsburgh |
Allegations only. No findings of wrongdoing have been made.
|
|
DR. HURWITZ’S TAKE
For families, the practical effect is not on this year’s applicant pool; it is on the research enterprise that funds graduate stipends, undergraduate research slots, and lab opportunities at these schools. Two things can be true at once: oversight of federal research dollars is legitimate, and sweeping subpoenas can chill the international collaboration that drives research. If your student is headed toward a research-heavy major, do not rebuild your list around these headlines. Instead, ask each department directly how its labs are funded and whether undergraduates get real access — and remember that allegations are not findings.
|
|
THE CASE FOR AGGRESSIVE OVERSIGHT
- Federal research dollars warrant scrutiny of how labor is hired and paid
- Supporters say wage undercutting hurts American graduate students and early-career researchers
- Transparency about foreign influence is a legitimate national-security interest
- Investigations of well-resourced universities may spur stronger compliance everywhere
|
|
|
|
THE CASE FOR CAUTION
- The headline figures are officials’ claims; no findings have been made
- Universities say J-1 participants are individually vetted by the government
- Broad subpoenas burden institutions and may chill international collaboration
- Similar enforcement efforts have met resistance in court, so outcomes remain uncertain
|
|
|
✓ ACTION CHECKLIST
| ✓ |
Don’t change your college list over a headline — these are investigations, not rulings. |
| ✓ |
Ask research-oriented departments how labs are funded and how undergraduates get involved. |
| ✓ |
Follow each university’s own statements for updates rather than social-media summaries. |
| ✓ |
Counselors: remind seniors that allegations and findings are different things. |
|
|
| ✦ ✦ ✦ |
| TOPIC 03 |
ADMISSIONS · JUSTICE DEPARTMENT · THE ESSAY |
DOJ Says UCLA Law Used Race in Admissions — and Points to Personal Statements
The finding adds another University of California program to the Justice Department’s list and puts a spotlight on how essays are read.
On Oct. 1, the Justice Department announced a finding that UCLA’s law school discriminated against white and Asian applicants and favored Black and Latino applicants in the 2023, 2024, and 2025 admissions cycles, in violation of federal law. DOJ has made similar accusations against UC Berkeley’s law school and the medical schools at UCLA and UC San Diego. Harmeet Dhillon, who leads the Civil Rights Division, called it a “two-tiered admissions system.” UCLA disputes the finding and says its review process is comprehensive and merit-based.
The reasoning matters beyond law school. DOJ argues that colleges use personal statements and other proxies to weigh race, and it cited a gap in average LSAT scores between admitted Black and white applicants. The 2023 Supreme Court decision ended race-conscious admissions, but it still allows schools to consider an applicant’s own account of how race has affected their life, so long as it is tied to a specific quality of character or ability.
The finding opens the door to a voluntary resolution requiring UCLA to follow DOJ’s reading of the law; if no agreement is reached, the department could sue. No court has ruled. The same legal line governs undergraduate admissions, which is why this case is worth watching even if your student never plans to apply to law school.
|
ELITE SPOTLIGHT: DOJ’S GROWING LIST OF UC PROGRAMS
| UCLA School of Law |
DOJ finding, Oct. 1, 2026 (cycles 2023–2025) |
| UC Berkeley School of Law |
Similar accusation previously made |
| UCLA medical school |
Similar accusation previously made |
| UC San Diego medical school |
Similar accusation previously made |
| Legal status |
Findings and allegations — no court ruling |
|
|
DR. HURWITZ’S TAKE
Whatever you think of the legal fight, the lesson for applicants is the same: the essay that works is specific, personal, and concrete — what you did, what you learned, what it cost you — not a demographic label. Schools may read about your lived experience; they may not treat your category as a credit, and writing to a perceived formula tends to produce flat essays anyway. Keep your testing plan intentional too: DOJ cited a score gap here, a reminder that numbers are the easiest thing for regulators to measure. My read is that admissions offices will get more cautious about how they train readers and word prompts, so build your essay around the one story only you can tell.
|
|
THE CASE FOR DOJ’S APPROACH
- Supporters say the 2023 ruling must be enforced in practice, including against proxies
- Clear, record-based criteria are argued to be fairer to every applicant
- Scrutiny may push schools toward more transparent admissions data
- Findings create a defined path to voluntary resolution without a lawsuit
|
|
|
|
THE CASE FOR UCLA’S POSITION
- UCLA and defenders say holistic review is lawful and merit-based
- Critics worry findings could chill the individual-experience consideration the Court allowed
- DOJ findings are not court judgments, so questions of proof remain open
- Uncertainty could complicate how essays are read and prompts are written
|
|
|
✓ ACTION CHECKLIST
| ✓ |
Draft your essay around a concrete experience — specific scenes, decisions, and results. |
| ✓ |
Avoid writing about identity as a checkbox; connect any experience to a quality you demonstrated. |
| ✓ |
Make a deliberate testing plan and check each school’s current test policy. |
| ✓ |
Read each school’s published admissions-review policy and common data set. |
|
|
| ✦ ✦ ✦ |
| TOPIC 04 |
FINANCIAL AID · DATA |
FAFSA Opens at Record Speed — But Many Colleges Haven’t Filed Their Own Outcomes Data
The 2027–28 form launched Sept. 23, the earliest in history, as the Education Department reports more than 1,000 colleges missed an outcomes-data deadline.
The 2027–28 FAFSA opened to all students on Sept. 23, 2026, beating last year’s record launch by a day. The Education Department says most families can finish in about 15 minutes, with plainer language, text invitations for parents and other contributors, a simpler renewal process, a new fraud-detection system, and a display of potential earnings outcomes for schools a student is considering. For seniors, this is the form that governs aid for fall 2027.
The earnings information families may see depends on institutions doing their own reporting, and many have not. Inside Higher Ed reports that just over 1,000 colleges missed the Oct. 1 deadline for fully submitting required student-outcomes data. The department’s Oct. 8 update lists 1,396 institutions missing files for the 2024 and 2025 reporting cycles, down from 1,930 in August, and about 37 percent (1,726) missing at least one file across all three cycles.
The final deadline is Jan. 15, 2027, and the department says it will not be extended; Federal Student Aid warns that noncompliant institutions’ access to federal grants and loans “could be at risk.” The reporting does not spell out whether the missing files directly affect what the FAFSA displays, so treat that connection as unconfirmed. The takeaway for families is simpler: an earnings figure is one input, and it may be incomplete.
|
KEY DATES FOR FAMILIES
| Sept. 23, 2026 |
2027–28 FAFSA opens to all students |
| Oct. 1, 2026 |
Outcomes-data deadline missed by just over 1,000 colleges |
| Oct. 8, 2026 |
ED update: 1,396 institutions missing 2024–2025 files |
| ~Nov. 1, 2026 |
Common Early Action / Early Decision deadlines — about three weeks out |
| Jan. 15, 2027 |
Outcomes-data deadline; ED says no extension |
|
|
DR. HURWITZ’S TAKE
File early, but file carefully: submit the FAFSA as soon as your tax documents are in order, then check each college’s own priority deadline, because some institutional aid runs out. Treat earnings-outcome numbers as one data point among many; the program, the local job market, and what you will actually pay matter just as much as a median salary. And if your student is in 9th or 10th grade, think of this as a preview of how the process will feel in two years, and start building your document folder now.
|
|
STARTING EARLY? THIS IS FOR YOU.
Families of 8th–10th graders: get the Parent Starter Kit — a free, plain-English roadmap to what matters now, what can wait, and how aid and deadlines really work.
|
|
WHY THE EARLY LAUNCH HELPS
- More time to gather documents, compare award letters, and correct errors
- A shorter, plainer form reduces abandoned applications
- Outcomes information puts earnings data in front of families at the moment of decision
- Fraud detection is meant to protect aid for students who need it
|
|
|
|
WHAT TO WATCH
- An early form does not mean early award letters — college timelines still vary
- Missing outcomes data from many colleges means incomplete comparisons
- Fraud screening may add a verification step some families must navigate
- Earnings medians cannot predict any one student’s results
|
|
|
✓ ACTION CHECKLIST
| ✓ |
Submit the 2027–28 FAFSA as soon as your tax documents are ready. |
| ✓ |
List every school’s institutional aid priority deadline in one calendar. |
| ✓ |
Compare net price, not sticker price, using each school’s net price calculator. |
| ✓ |
Ask admissions whether the college has completed its federal outcomes reporting. |
|
|
| ✦ ✦ ✦ |
| TOPIC 05 |
COLLEGE FINANCES · DUE DILIGENCE |
Is Your College Choice Financially Sound? Massachusetts Raises the Bar on Closure Warnings
Early-notice rules, budget-driven job cuts, and a fall dip in international enrollment all point to the same advice: vet a college’s finances before you deposit.
Massachusetts announced new rules at a meeting on Sept. 30: private colleges must alert students by Dec. 31 each year if they may fail to meet their financial obligations within 18 months. The state will also add fiduciary training for leaders of at-risk institutions, bring in outside financial experts, and strengthen closure contingency planning, including transfer pathways and teach-out budgets. The changes follow two 2026 closures. Anna Maria College announced it would close less than two weeks after the state alerted the public to its finances in April, and Hampshire College announced its closure the same month without prior state warning, then secured a multimillion-dollar loan to operate through the fall term. Regulators noted that leaders often wait until spring deposit deadlines to decide whether they can survive another year.
The pressure is not limited to small privates. Commonwealth University of Pennsylvania, formed by merging Bloomsburg, Lock Haven, and Mansfield, says it could eliminate about 175 positions to address a $17 million operating deficit, with cuts completed by June 30, 2027. Its estimated fall headcount is 10,169, which is 82 below its goal.
Fall enrollment data show another strain. Ohio State’s overall enrollment rose 1.4 percent, yet its international enrollment fell 12.7 percent to 5,234. Indiana University’s international enrollment fell 15.6 percent to 4,763, and the University of North Texas lost more than 1,300 international students. Because international students typically pay full sticker price, declines can squeeze budgets even when total headcount grows. Cited causes include the federal crackdown on visas and, in Indiana, a new state law requiring background checks for certain international students.
|
FALL 2026 INTERNATIONAL ENROLLMENT SNAPSHOT
| Ohio State University |
−12.7% (to 5,234); overall +1.4% |
| Indiana University |
−15.6% (to 4,763) |
| University of North Texas |
More than 1,300 fewer international students |
| University of Colorado |
582 of the system’s 926-student decline |
| Universities of Wisconsin (preliminary) |
About 1,100 of a 1,732-student decline |
| University of Maine System |
−7.2% from 2025 |
|
|
DR. HURWITZ’S TAKE
No family should panic over a single budget headline; most colleges with deficits stay open, and many are making sensible adjustments. But “will this college still be here in four years, with the programs I am paying for?” is a fair question, and it is one you can ask in writing. Ask admissions about recent program cuts, layoffs, and accreditation or credit-rating actions; confirm teach-out and transfer agreements; and read the deposit-refund policy before May 1. A generous merit award from a financially wobbly college can still be a bad deal if the college cannot deliver the degree.
|
|
THE CASE FOR EARLY WARNINGS
- Students get notice before spring deposit deadlines instead of after
- Regulators gain tools to intervene and plan transfers sooner
- Transparency pushes institutions to confront problems earlier
- Teach-out and transfer planning protects students who are already enrolled
|
|
|
|
THE CASE FOR CAUTION
- Critics of such disclosures worry a warning can itself trigger enrollment losses
- The Massachusetts rule covers private colleges in that state only
- Coverage of the announcement mentions no penalties for noncompliance
- Warnings cannot fix the demographic and budget pressures behind the deficits
|
|
|
✓ ACTION CHECKLIST
| ✓ |
Ask each college in writing about recent program cuts, layoffs, and budget deficits. |
| ✓ |
Check the college’s accreditation status and any public notices from its state regulator. |
| ✓ |
Confirm teach-out and transfer agreements exist before you deposit. |
| ✓ |
Read the deposit-refund and withdrawal policies before May 1. |
|
|
|
GUIDANCE COUNSELOR CORNER
A Note for Those Who Advise Families
On the OPT proposal and the visa-duration ruling: If you advise international or mixed-status families, give them two concrete steps this month: have them check their I-94 for a “D/S” notation, and have them ask each prospective school, in writing, whether it intends to support OPT if the fee rule is finalized. Both the OPT proposal and the duration-of-status appeal are unresolved, so the honest message is “plan for uncertainty, don’t panic.” Please also remind students that the J-1 and Harvard stories this edition involve allegations and subpoenas, not findings.
On essays and the DOJ’s UCLA Law finding: Expect students to ask whether they should write about identity at all. The legal line has not changed since 2023: students may write about how their experiences shaped their character, but the essay works best when it is specific and concrete rather than categorical. Steer seniors toward one real story told in detail, and keep testing decisions deliberate rather than reactive.
On the FAFSA launch and college financial health: The early FAFSA gives you a rare opportunity to get seniors’ aid applications done before the holiday crunch. Pair that with a simple due-diligence habit: have students ask each college about recent cuts, accreditation status, and teach-out arrangements, and compare net price instead of sticker price. With more than 1,000 colleges behind on federal outcomes reporting, remind families that earnings figures are a starting point, not a verdict.
Forward freely with attribution to Higher Ed Insider and Hurwitz Consulting — if this is useful to a colleague, a PTA group, or a family you know, please pass it along.
|
|
FOR FAMILIES
Your Action Guide — Edition 2026-24
Dr. Hurwitz’s Analysis · Sept. 26 – Oct. 9, 2026
| 1 |
File the 2027–28 FAFSA early.
The form opened Sept. 23, the earliest launch ever. Submit it as soon as your tax documents are ready, then calendar each college’s own aid priority deadline.
|
| 2 |
Compare net price, not sticker price.
Use each school’s net price calculator and line up award letters side by side. A smaller merit award at a stable college can beat a bigger one at a shaky one.
|
| 3 |
Ask about financial health in writing.
Email admissions about recent program cuts, layoffs, accreditation actions, and teach-out agreements. Confirm deposit-refund rules before you commit by May 1.
|
| 4 |
Make the essay specific, not categorical.
Build it around one concrete experience told in detail and tied to a quality you demonstrated. That approach is stronger and safer in the current legal climate.
|
| 5 |
International families: get answers in writing.
Ask every school whether it will support OPT and STEM OPT if the proposed fee is finalized, and check your I-94 for “D/S.” Avoid irreversible decisions based on rumors about pending appeals.
|
| 6 |
Lock your early deadlines now.
Most Early Action and Early Decision deadlines fall around Nov. 1 and Nov. 15, roughly three weeks away. Work backward to set draft, recommendation, and testing milestones this weekend.
|
|
DR. HURWITZ’S BOTTOM LINE
This edition’s stories share a thread: the rules around admissions, aid, and international study are shifting faster than most families can track, and the ones who do best verify rather than assume. Verify the college’s finances, verify the aid deadlines, and verify the policy in writing. If you want help turning that into a plan for your student, reply to this email or book a College Readiness Assessment.
|
|
|
READY FOR A PLAN?
Book a College Readiness Assessment
A 60-minute one-on-one session ($225) to map your student’s strengths, timeline, and next steps — with straight answers on aid and fit.
Know a family who needs this? Send them the free subscribe link.
|
|
WATCH. READ. FOLLOW.
YouTube: @HurwitzAdmissions | Blog: hurwitzadmissions.com/blog | Facebook: Hurwitz Admissions | Instagram: @hurwitzadmissions
|
|
Higher Ed Insider
hurwitzadmissions.com · nathan@hurwitzadmissions.com · (203) 613-9262
Hurwitz Consulting · The Tutor Duo | Sources are linked in each story. Allegations and proposals are labeled as such.
© 2026 Hurwitz Consulting. All rights reserved. | Unsubscribe
|
|
|