Higher Ed Insider — Edition 2026-22
| Higher Education Intelligence for Families |
Free Newsletter |
|
|
HIGHER ED INSIDER
By Dr. Nathan Hurwitz · Hurwitz Consulting
|
|
|
| EDITION 2026-22 · Aug 29 – Sep 11, 2026 |
© 2026 Hurwitz Consulting |
|
|
WATCH. READ. FOLLOW.
YouTube: @HurwitzAdmissions · Blog: hurwitzadmissions.com/blog · Facebook: Hurwitz Admissions · IG: @hurwitzadmissions
|
|
| BY THE NUMBERS |
|
18,000+
Private schools affected by IRS tax-exempt rule
|
Sep. 15
Duration of Status rule takes effect
|
370–48
House vote passing continuing resolution
|
|
$7,395
Max Pell Grant level-funded through Dec. 11
|
30
Universities ordered to audit China ties
|
Sep. 21
Accreditation reform comment deadline
|
|
|
|
EDITOR'S NOTE
Dear Parents and Guidance Counselors,
This is one of those editions where the speed of policy change makes your head spin. On September 4, the Treasury Department and IRS proposed a rule that could strip tax-exempt status from any private school — K–12 through university — that considers race in admissions, scholarships, or any program. Meanwhile, the September 15 deadline for the end of Duration of Status is days away, and a federal lawsuit aimed at blocking the rule just had its court hearing last week. At the same time, Congress managed to avert a government shutdown with a continuing resolution that keeps Pell Grant funding level through December — buying time, but not solving anything.
What ties these stories together is a single theme: the federal government is reshaping the rules of higher education from multiple directions simultaneously. Accreditation reform, research security mandates, tax policy, immigration policy, and spending decisions are all moving at once. For families navigating the admissions process right now — especially those with Early Decision deadlines approaching — understanding this landscape is not optional. It is essential.
Let's get into it.
— Dr. Nathan Hurwitz
College Admissions Consultant · Hurwitz Consulting · (203) 613-9262
|
|
|
This Week's Coverage
01 Tax-Exempt Bombshell: IRS Takes Aim at Race-Conscious Policies
02 Duration of Status Ends Sept. 15 — Lawsuit Outcome Pending
03 Congress Averts Shutdown, Pell Grant Level-Funded Through Dec. 11
04 Accreditation Overhaul: Comments Due Sept. 21
05 Pentagon Orders 30 Universities to Audit China Research Ties
|
|
|
TOPIC 01 TAX POLICY
Tax-Exempt Bombshell: IRS Proposes Stripping Status From Schools With Race-Conscious Policies
Proposed regulation would affect 18,000+ private schools and could reshape admissions, scholarships, and financial aid nationwide — comments due November 3.
On September 3, the U.S. Treasury Department and IRS published proposed regulations that would deny federal tax-exempt status to any private school that considers race, color, or national or ethnic origin in any program or policy — including those designed to promote diversity or remedy past discrimination. The rule would apply to admissions, scholarships, athletics, and every other school-administered program at private K–12 schools, colleges, universities, professional schools, and trade schools.
The stakes are enormous. Loss of tax-exempt status means a school's net income becomes subject to federal income tax, donations to the school are no longer tax-deductible for donors, and tax-exempt bond financing could be jeopardized. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said that "rebranding race-based preferences as equitable, inclusive, or diversity-enhancing" does not change their discriminatory nature. The proposal explicitly eliminates existing IRS guidance that had permitted schools to favor racial minority groups for remedial purposes.
Treasury and the IRS estimate the proposed rule could affect more than 18,000 private educational institutions and roughly 750,000 students who qualify for race- or ethnicity-based scholarships. If finalized, the rule would take effect for taxable years beginning after May 31, 2027, giving schools time to amend policies. Public comments are open through November 3, 2026. The rule does not apply to religious admissions criteria.
|
Key Data Points
18,000+ private schools potentially affected
750,000 students on race- or ethnicity-based scholarships at risk
November 3, 2026 — public comment deadline
May 31, 2027 — earliest effective date if finalized
|
|
DR. HURWITZ'S TAKE
This is the most consequential tax policy proposal for higher education since the endowment tax was first enacted in 2017. If finalized, it will force every private college in America to audit every scholarship, fellowship, outreach program, and admissions practice that touches race or ethnicity — or risk losing the tax-exempt status that underpins their financial model. Families applying to private colleges should watch this closely: if schools restructure their scholarship programs to comply, it could change the financial aid landscape for diverse applicants. Start asking admissions offices directly how they are preparing.
|
| |
|
PROS
✓ Enforces race-neutral standards post-SFFA decision
✓ Creates uniform federal standard for all private schools
✓ Religious admissions criteria explicitly excluded
|
|
| |
|
CONS
✗ Could eliminate diversity-focused scholarships
✗ Affects 750,000 students currently on targeted aid
✗ Tax-deductibility loss could reduce alumni donations
|
|
|
✓ ACTION CHECKLIST
✓ Ask target schools how they plan to respond to the proposed rule
✓ Review any race- or ethnicity-based scholarships your family has applied for
✓ Watch for institutional responses — many schools will issue statements before Nov. 3
|
|
|
|
TOPIC 02 IMMIGRATION
Duration of Status Ends Sept. 15 — Lawsuit Outcome Pending as Students Scramble
NAFSA-led coalition and 20 state attorneys general challenge the rule in federal court. Hearing held Sept. 3 — no ruling yet.
The most significant change to international student immigration in 50 years is set to take effect on September 15, 2026. The Department of Homeland Security's final rule eliminates "Duration of Status" — the longstanding framework that allowed F-1 students and J-1 exchange visitors to remain in the U.S. as long as they were making academic progress. Under the new rule, international students will be admitted for a fixed period capped at four years and must apply for costly extensions through USCIS if their programs take longer.
A coalition of eight organizations — led by NAFSA, the Presidents' Alliance on Higher Education, the AFT, and the UAW — filed a federal lawsuit on August 18 seeking to block the rule. A preliminary injunction hearing took place on September 3 before Judge F. Dennis Saylor IV in the U.S. District Court for Massachusetts. On August 25, attorneys general from 20 states and the District of Columbia filed an amicus brief supporting the challenge, arguing the rule would cause "severe harms on public educational institutions, academic communities, and broader local and state communities."
The impact is already being felt. Colleges report that some international students have withdrawn their fall 2026 enrollment out of concern about the rule, and international applications dropped significantly at many institutions this cycle. The rule also shortens the F-1 post-completion grace period from 60 to 30 days and imposes new restrictions on students' ability to change majors or transfer institutions. Students already in the U.S. on September 15 are covered by transition provisions — but those protections evaporate if they travel abroad and re-enter.
|
What Changes on September 15
D/S → Fixed admission capped at 4 years (or program end date, whichever is shorter)
Grace period: 60 days → 30 days for F-1 students
New restrictions on changing majors, transferring, or adding programs
~1.2 million international students affected
|
|
DR. HURWITZ'S TAKE
This is the immigration story with the most direct impact on the families I work with — and it cuts in two directions. For domestic applicants, reduced international enrollment could mean less competition at some schools and potentially more institutional aid dollars redirected toward domestic students. But for any family with international ties, or for students planning graduate programs alongside international peers, this rule introduces real uncertainty. If you are an international student already in the U.S., do not travel abroad before consulting your school's international student office. And all families should ask admissions offices how declining international enrollment is affecting campus culture and financial aid distribution.
|
| |
|
PROS
✓ May redirect institutional aid toward domestic students
✓ Federal lawsuit could block the rule before Sept. 15
✓ Transition provisions protect students currently enrolled
|
|
| |
|
CONS
✗ International enrollment already declining — campuses lose diversity
✗ Full-tuition international students subsidized domestic aid
✗ PhD students in 5–7 year programs face costly extension filings
|
|
|
✓ ACTION CHECKLIST
✓ International families: consult your school's international student office immediately
✓ Ask target schools how international enrollment changes affect aid availability
✓ Monitor the federal lawsuit — a preliminary injunction could change everything
|
|
|
|
TOPIC 03 FEDERAL FUNDING
Congress Averts Shutdown: Pell Grant Level-Funded at $7,395 Through December 11
House passes continuing resolution 370–48, buying time for FY27 spending negotiations while blocking controversial grant reform.
On September 1, the House of Representatives voted 370–48 to pass a continuing resolution that extends current federal funding levels through December 11, 2026. The Senate had already approved the measure on August 8 by a vote of 90–6. The bill now heads to President Trump for signing, averting a government shutdown before the fiscal year ends on September 30.
For higher education, the most important outcome is stability — at least for now. The maximum Pell Grant remains at $7,395. All federal education programs continue at current FY2026 levels. The resolution also blocks a proposed OMB rule that would have expanded federal agencies' discretion to withhold or terminate grants — a provision that had caused significant alarm in the research university community.
Congress has still not finished work on any of the 12 full-year spending bills for FY2027. The December 11 deadline, set after the midterm elections, creates the next potential crisis point. None of the major higher education funding questions — the Pell Grant shortfall, research agency budgets, or the future of the Education Department itself — are resolved. This is a pause, not a solution.
|
STARTING EARLY? THIS IS FOR YOU.
Get Dr. Hurwitz's free Parent Starter Kit — a step-by-step guide to the admissions process for families of 9th and 10th graders.
|
|
DR. HURWITZ'S TAKE
Level funding sounds like good news, and it is — compared to a shutdown. But "level" does not mean "adequate." The Pell Grant has not kept pace with tuition increases, and the underlying shortfall has not gone away. For families filing the FAFSA this fall, the maximum award is the same as last year. The real fight happens in December, and what Congress decides about FY2027 education funding will determine whether financial aid keeps up or falls further behind. File your FAFSA early and explore every institutional aid avenue you can.
|
| |
|
PROS
✓ No government shutdown — federal aid processing continues
✓ Pell Grant maximum holds at $7,395
✓ OMB grant reform rule blocked during CR period
|
|
| |
|
CONS
✗ No full-year FY27 bills passed — December 11 is next cliff
✗ Level funding = real-dollar decline due to inflation
✗ Research budgets remain frozen during critical grant cycles
|
|
|
✓ ACTION CHECKLIST
✓ File your FAFSA as early as possible once the 2027–28 form opens
✓ Apply for institutional aid at every school on your list — do not assume the Pell covers enough
✓ Set a calendar reminder for Dec. 11 — the next potential funding disruption
|
|
|
|
TOPIC 04 ACCREDITATION
Accreditation Overhaul: Outcomes-Based Standards and the End of Regional Distinctions
Public comments close September 21. If finalized, the rule would take effect July 2027 — reshaping how every college in America is evaluated.
On August 20, the Department of Education published a sweeping proposed rule to overhaul the higher education accreditation system. The rule implements Executive Order 14279, "Reforming Accreditation to Strengthen Higher Education," and was developed through the Accreditation, Innovation, and Modernization (AIM) negotiated rulemaking process. Comments are due September 21 — just 10 days from now.
The proposed changes are fundamental. The rule would eliminate the historical distinction between "regional" and "national" accreditors, allow institutions to hold multiple accreditations simultaneously, and streamline the path for new accreditors to enter the market. Most significantly, accreditors would be required to evaluate institutions based on measurable student outcomes — employment rates, completion rates, and economic returns — rather than process-based compliance metrics.
The rule also includes provisions prohibiting accreditation standards that encourage violations of federal anti-discrimination law and mandating protections for academic freedom and intellectual diversity. Under Secretary Nicholas Kent characterized the changes as necessary to "reorient our quality assurance framework so that accreditors prioritize student outcomes rather than bureaucratic processes." If finalized by November 1 of this year, the rule would take effect July 1, 2027.
|
DR. HURWITZ'S TAKE
Accreditation reform sounds like an inside-baseball story, but it affects every family considering college. Accreditation is the gatekeeper for federal financial aid — if your school loses its accreditation, your Pell Grant and federal loans disappear. The shift to outcomes-based evaluation means schools will be judged on whether graduates actually get jobs and finish their degrees, not just whether they check process boxes. That is fundamentally good for families. But the elimination of regional accreditor distinctions could also open the door to less rigorous oversight. When evaluating schools, always verify their accreditor and look at graduation and employment outcomes — not just acceptance rates.
|
| |
|
PROS
✓ Outcomes-based standards incentivize completion and employment
✓ More competition among accreditors could reduce institutional costs
✓ Academic freedom protections codified in federal regulation
|
|
| |
|
CONS
✗ Elimination of regional distinctions may weaken oversight quality
✗ 30-day comment period criticized as insufficient for complex rule
✗ "Intellectual diversity" mandate could be used to challenge curricula
|
|
|
✓ ACTION CHECKLIST
✓ Check the accreditation status and accreditor of every school on your list
✓ Look up graduation rates and post-graduation employment data at each target school
✓ Submit a public comment at regulations.gov before September 21 if you have a stake
|
|
|
|
TOPIC 05 RESEARCH SECURITY
Pentagon Orders 30 Universities to Audit China Research Ties or Lose Funding
Two-week compliance window to review partnerships with 130 foreign institutions. Failure to terminate "problematic" ties risks federal research funding eligibility.
On August 18, the Department of Defense ordered 30 unnamed U.S. universities to conduct sweeping audits of their research partnerships with 130 foreign institutions — the vast majority Chinese, with some Iranian and Russian entities included. Schools were given just two weeks to review their academic, financial, and research relationships and determine whether sensitive or export-controlled research had been exposed.
The list of foreign "entities of concern" includes both institutions with explicit military ties and prominent civilian universities such as Fudan University and Shanghai Jiao Tong University. Universities that fail to terminate partnerships deemed problematic risk losing eligibility for future federal research funding — a threat with real teeth at institutions where federally sponsored research accounts for hundreds of millions in annual revenue.
The American Council on Education pushed back, noting that it helped create the original list of foreign entities of concern during Trump's first term and that most member institutions had already moved away from those partnerships. The two-week compliance window has drawn particular criticism as unrealistic. This order reflects the broader trend of the federal government tightening research security requirements at universities — a dynamic that affects campus culture, faculty hiring, and international student recruitment alike.
|
DR. HURWITZ'S TAKE
Research security is a legitimate concern, and no one wants federally funded technology ending up in adversaries' hands. But the two-week timeline and the breadth of the list create a chilling effect that goes beyond the stated goal. For families, this story matters because it affects the research environment that graduate students — and increasingly, undergraduates — work in. If you are considering a research university, ask about the institution's approach to international collaboration. Schools that handle this thoughtfully will be more attractive employers for top faculty, which directly affects educational quality.
|
| |
|
PROS
✓ Protects taxpayer-funded research from misappropriation
✓ Creates clearer boundaries for international collaboration
✓ Built on original list developed with ACE input
|
|
| |
|
CONS
✗ Two-week audit window widely criticized as unrealistic
✗ List includes prominent civilian research universities
✗ Could deter international faculty and student recruitment
|
|
|
✓ ACTION CHECKLIST
✓ Research-minded students: ask about international collaboration policies at target schools
✓ Check whether target schools maintain research relationships with flagged institutions
✓ Consider how research security dynamics may affect graduate program culture
|
|
|
|
Guidance Counselor Corner
On the IRS Tax-Exempt Rule: This is the story your students' families will be hearing about from financial advisors, not from your office — yet. If the rule is finalized, it could restructure the scholarship landscape at private institutions across the board. Start familiarizing yourself with which of your students' target schools rely on race-conscious scholarship programs, and be prepared to discuss alternatives if those programs change.
On Duration of Status: Any international students in your school community — or international families considering U.S. colleges — need to hear from you now. The September 15 deadline is days away, and the lawsuit outcome remains uncertain. Direct families to their college's international student office and flag the travel restriction: leaving and re-entering the U.S. after September 15 triggers the new fixed-admission framework.
On Accreditation Reform: The comment deadline is September 21. If your school, district, or professional association has a position, now is the time to submit it. Outcomes-based accreditation standards will change how the schools you recommend are evaluated — and potentially which schools maintain federal aid eligibility.
Forward freely with attribution to Dr. Nathan Hurwitz, Higher Ed Insider. Subscribe free.
|
|
|
Your Action Guide — Edition 2026-22
Dr. Hurwitz's Analysis · Aug 29 – Sep 11, 2026
1. Audit Your Scholarship Strategy. If any of your target schools are private and you are counting on diversity-focused scholarships, contact admissions offices now to understand how they plan to respond to the IRS proposed rule. Do not wait for the November comment deadline to start asking questions.
2. Understand the International Student Landscape. Whether you are an international family or a domestic applicant, the Duration of Status changes will reshape campus demographics and financial aid pools. Ask admissions offices directly how international enrollment trends are affecting their incoming class and aid budgets.
3. File Your FAFSA Early. The continuing resolution keeps the Pell Grant at $7,395 through December. But this is a stopgap, not a guarantee. File as early as possible once the 2027–28 FAFSA opens, and do not rely on federal aid alone — layer institutional and state aid on top.
4. Verify Accreditation and Outcomes. With accreditation rules changing, now is the time to look beyond rankings. Check each target school's accreditor, six-year graduation rate, and post-graduation employment outcomes. These metrics will matter more, not less, under the new framework.
5. Research School Stability. The enrollment cliff is here. WICHE projects a 13% decline in high school graduates by 2041. Schools under 1,000 students with small endowments are most vulnerable. Check each school's financial health and enrollment trajectory before committing.
6. Set Calendar Reminders for Key Deadlines. September 15 (Duration of Status takes effect), September 21 (accreditation comment deadline), November 3 (IRS tax-exempt rule comment deadline), December 11 (next government funding expiration). These dates will drive the news cycle — and they may drive policy changes that directly affect your applications.
|
DR. HURWITZ'S BOTTOM LINE
The federal government is rewriting the rules of higher education from at least five directions at once — tax policy, immigration, spending, accreditation, and research security. No single one of these stories exists in isolation. Together, they are reshaping the financial, demographic, and institutional landscape that your family is navigating right now. The families that stay informed and ask the right questions will be the ones who make the best decisions. That is exactly what this newsletter is for.
|
|
|
|
Ready to Get Ahead?
Book a College Readiness Assessment
60 minutes with Dr. Hurwitz · Personalized strategy · $225
|
|
|